Maybe there just aren't that many people who want to publish documented family history, at least not both for long-term access and for access via the net. Most are just involved in the hunt, I suppose. Leaving markings of the trail for others may not be of interest to them. So maybe the "glaring need" for long term net publishing is in the eye of very few beholders.
Thursday, June 17, 2004
Previous Posts
- There seems to be a real lack of a good place to p...
- Re the "unauthorized posting" theme of the previou...
- A fellow was just complaining in a newsgroup that ...
- Hurray for the WayBack Machine! I was on a GenWeb...
- PHPGEDView can be used to support a web site for d...
- It's a meme! Found this experiment in another blo...
- I was looking at Family History Documentation Guid...
- Slashdot has an amusing discussion on nigritude u...
- It's amazing how much junk is floating around in t...
- Well, the modified GEDCOM does make a better basis...

2 Comments:
There's a need, but one must recognize that most people have only the most casual interest in most things, including their own family history.
I disagree with 'anonymous'. If there was only a casual interest' in such things as family history, whya re their so many people online doing their family history? Why are there numerous academic studies about genealogists?
It will be interesting to see what my survey says regarding 'people who want to publish documented family history', as my hunch was that most genealogists publishing something on the Internet ... perhaps even documented family trees.
Post a Comment
<< Home